Symposium: Evenwel v. Abbott and the Constitution’s big data problem


The plaintiffs in Evenwel v. Abbott deserve credit for highlighting an unappreciated feature of our system of representation and exposing a gap in the jurisprudence of one person, one vote. Their constitutional argument, however, is academic, at best, and at worst, dangerous and destabilizing for the redistricting process and the U.S. Census.


Read more at SCOTUS Blog

Issues: Demographics

Related Articles:

About the Author

Nathaniel Persily

Charles Keller Beekman Professor of Law and Political Science, Columbia University School of Law

Nathaniel Persily

Nathaniel Persily is the Charles Keller Beekman Professor of Law and Political Science and the Director of the Center for Law and Politics at Columbia Law School. Professor Persily’s scholarship focuses on American election law or what is sometimes called the “law of democracy,” which addresses issues such as voting rights, political parties, campaign finance, […]

Related Experts


Barbara Arnwine

President and Executive Director, Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights

Barry COB photo

Barry Fadem

President, National Popular Vote

Monica Youn_sm_color

Monica Youn

Brennan Center Constitutional Fellow, Brennan Center for Justice, New York University School of Law